Part Twenty-Four: Scholars Who Believe in Animal Resurrection
Before we begin looking at the
evidence that at least sentient earthly animal will be resurrected, I want to
point out that many well-known theologians agree with this conclusion.
Christian thinkers over the centuries, especially Reformation and post-Reformation
theologians, have acknowledged the likelihood of animal resurrection. When
great thinkers, who spend much of their lives studying and teaching about
theological issues, agree that animals will probably be resurrected, it’s
compelling evidence they will. The fact is belief in the probability of animal
resurrection in the eschaton is not without endorsement from well-respected
theologians and scholars.
Blog
articles limit the amount and length of the quotes I can include, but I want to
share a few excerpts from some of the more well-known scholars who accept the
likelihood of animal resurrection. (Anyone interest in my sources for the
following quotes, you can contact me through my website: www.danstory.net.)
Martin Luther
When the great Reformation theologian Martin
Luther was asked if he believed dogs, in particular his dog Tólpel, would be in
heaven, he answered: “Certainly, for there the earth will not be without form
and void. Peter said that the last day would be the restitution of all things.
God will create a new heaven and a new earth and new Tólpes with hide of gold
and silver. God will be all in all; and snakes, now poisonous because of
original sin, will then be so harmless that we shall be able to play with
them.” Elsewhere, commenting on Psalm 36:6 (“O Lord, you preserve both
man and beast.”), Luther remarked that the passage affirms, “that God is
rightly called the ‘Saviour of all beasts.’”
John Calvin
Another
Reformation scholar who seemed to have acknowledged the probability of animal
resurrection is John Calvin. He observed “that nonhuman animals long to
participate in . . . redemption,” and made a provocative statement in
“Speculation About Animals” that implies he
believed in animal resurrection: “Because the creatures . . . have a
hope of being freed hereafter from corruption, it follows that they groan like
a woman in labour until they have been delivered . . . . In short, the
creatures are not content with their present condition, and yet they do not
pine away irremediably. They are,
however, in labour, because they are waiting to be renewed to a better state”
(emphasis added). Commenting on Romans
1:20, Calvin wrote: “No part of the universe is untouched by the longing with
which everything on this world aspires to the hope of resurrection.”
Calvin,
like Luther, did not develop (that I know of) an explicit doctrinal
statement on whether or not animals will resurrect. But, as the above comments
illustrate, both their writings imply they likely believed in animal resurrection.
John Wesley
Probably
no well-known theologian has expressed a greater and more passionate belief
that animals will resurrect than the eighteenth century Anglican clergyman,
evangelist, and cofounder of Methodism, John Wesley. He argued that Romans
8:19-22 implies that the future New Earth would include the exact same animals
that presently dwell on this earth. He believed this was the only way earthly
animals could be delivered from the curse. Wesley “hoped for a ‘general
deliverance’ in which, after death, animals will be compensated for the
suffering they underwent and liberated from the rages of which they partook” on
this earth due to human fallenness.
Peter Kreeft
Answering
the question, “are there animals in heaven?,” well known theologian Peter
Kreeft makes no bones about his belief in the resurrection of animals:
The simplest answer is: Why not? How irrational is the prejudice that
would allow plants (green fields and flowers) but not animals into Heaven . . .
Would the same animals be in Heaven as on earth? “Is my dead cat in heaven?” Again, why not?
God can rise up the very grass; why not cats? . . . We were meant from the beginning to have
stewardship over the animals; we have not fulfilled that divine plan yet on
earth; therefore it seems likely that the right relationship with animals will
be part of Heaven: proper “petship.” And what better place to begin than with
already petted pets? (Everything You Ever Wanted to
Know about Heaven . . . But Never Dreamed of Asking, 45-46).
Hank
Hanegraaff
The “Bible Answer Man” likewise supports the probability of animal
resurrection:
Scripture does not conclusively tell us whether our pets will make it to
heaven. However, the Bible does provide us with some significant clues
regarding whether animals will inhabit the new heaven and the new earth. . . .
Furthermore, the Scriptures from first to last suggests that animals
have souls. . . .It wasn’t until the advent of the seventeenth-century
Enlightenment and the thought of Descartes and Hobbes that the existence of
animal souls was even questioned in Western civilization. . . .
Finally, while we cannot say
for certain that the pets we enjoy today will be “resurrected” in eternity, I,
like Joni [Eareckson Tada] are not willing to preclude the possibility. Some of
the keenest thinkers from C. S. Lewis to Peter Kreeft are not only convinced
that animals in general but that pets in particular will be restored in the
resurrection.. . .
In the final analysis, one
thing is certain: Scripture provides us with a sufficient precedent for
suggesting that animals will continue to exist after the return of our Lord. (Resurrection, 120-122).
Randy
Alcorn
This popular writer, conference speaker, and
the author of the highly acclaimed book, Heaven, clearly expects animals
to be resurrected:
We know animals will be on
the New Earth, which is a redeemed and renewed old Earth, in which animals had
a prominent role. People will be resurrected to inhabit this world. As we saw,
Romans 8:21-23 assumes animals as part of a suffering creation eagerly awaiting
deliverance through humanity’s resurrection. This seems to require that some
animals who lived, suffered, and died on the old Earth must be made whole on
the New Earth. Wouldn’t some of those likely be our pets? (Heaven, 386).
I have two more contemporary scholars
to quote, but ran out of space in this article. Next week we’ll see what two
other world-class scholars have to say on the subject: C. S. Lewis and British
theologian Richard Bauckham.
* The blog articles in this
series are adapted from copyrighted material and may not be reproduced in book or article form, either
electronically or in print, without my written permission. But feel free to
send links to these articles, with a brief introduction, to your personal email
list, Facebook friends and groups, or other people who may enjoy them. Or post
a link on your own website. If you would like to be added to my personal
blog email list (people who receive an email notice whenever I post a new blog
article), contact me through my website: www.danstory.net.
No comments:
Post a Comment