I recently had an
interview on a Christian radio station; the topic was Christian
environmentalism. Before the host introduced me, he told his listening audience
that he is against environmentalism. In his opinion, spending money to
protect endangered plants and animals is a waste of taxpayer’s money and a
hindrance to economic development and human interests.
Unfortunately, when secular
environmentalists hear this kind of sentiment from a Christian, it reinforces
their belief that the origin of today’s environmental problems can be traced
directly to the Judeo/Christian worldview. The most well known advocate of this
theory was the late historian, Lynn White, Jr. In an address to the American Association
for the Advancement of Science in 1966, White presented his thesis that the
“historical root” of the modern environmental crisis was the marriage of
science and technology in the middle of the 19th century under the umbrella of
Christianity. Presumably, the Bible—in particular Genesis 1:28, which
instructed Adam to “subdue” the earth and have “dominion over other
animals—encourages Christians to exploit nature with little regard for the
welfare of other life forms or the land. Although many Christian scholars took
issue with White’s assumptions—and refuted them on many different points—his
view nevertheless became the default position of academia and non-Christian
environmentalists.
The fact is, however, Christianity
is not the blame for modern environmental problems—the entire human race is the
blame. Every society—and under the
banner of every religion—has exploited its natural environments. This began ten
thousand years ago, long before Christianity. Ancient hunters in the North
America (Paleoindians), for example, contributed to the extinction of many
large Pleistocene animals, including the cave bear, mammoth, mastodon, ground
sloth, camels, dire wolves, and saber-tooth cats. Over a period of several
thousand years, hunting and gathering declined and many cultures turned to
herding sheep, goats, and cattle. Shepherds typically overgrazed their
livestock and often set fires to large tracks of brush and forest to create
open grassland. “Early men,” explained Pulitzer Prize-winner, the late Dr. Rene’
Dubos, “aided especially by the most useful and most noxious of all animals, the Mediterranean goat, were
probably responsible for more deforestation and erosion than all the bulldozers
of the Judeo-Christian world.”
Farmers
followed the shepherds, causing more widespread devastation to the environment.
Poor farming practices allowed topsoil to be lost; improper irrigation and
drainage lead to the accumulation of salts in the soil, destroying its
productivity and forcing farmers to clear ever more land; forests were burnt to
provide farmland, exterminating indigenous plants and animals.
The historical fact is that
non-Western, non-Christian societies have caused massive environmental damage
over vast portions of Europe, North America, Africa, Asia, the Mid East, and
Australia. Extensive erosion, widespread deforestation, and the total
extermination of plant and animal species have been a byproduct of human
societies long before the Christian era.
Besides corporate humanity’s
inherent proclivity to exploit his environment with little concern for other
living things, there is an even greater factor responsible for today’s
environment crisis: unregulated technology. The Industrial Revolution, which
began in the eighteenth century, ushered in spectacular advances in technology.
By the twentieth century, one man with a bulldozer could do more damage to the
environment than hundreds of men with picks and shovels. Ultimately, the root
cause of the twentieth century’s environmental crisis was technology running
amok without ethical restraints. Unregulated technologic power over nature
created environmental pollution and degradation, as we know it today.
Christianity did not cause the modern environmental crisis; unbridled
technology operating within an emerging secular society is responsible.
In order to see this, it’s important
to understand that advances in highly efficient technology occurred
simultaneously with the fading authority and influence of the Christian
worldview. Beginning in the eighteenth century Enlightenment, Christianity
became increasingly rejected as the dominant worldview in western
culture—humanity was replacing God as Supreme Being. By the twentieth century,
secular humanism had become the dominant worldview in the West, jettisoning many
of the moral values that were fundamental to western culture for eighteen
centuries. Thus, by the beginning of the mid–twentieth century’s environmental
crisis, Christianity was no longer the dominant moral light in the West, and
the authority of the Bible outside the church was largely rejected in popular
culture. During the interim between the end of the Christian era and the modern
environmental crisis, no ethical constraints arose to control—let alone
prevent—the crushing technological exploitation of the earth’s natural
environments. As French historian and sociologist Jacques Ellul stated, “The
technical movement of the West developed in a world which had already withdrawn
from the dominant influence of Christianity.”
In sum, Christianity is not the root
cause of today’s environmental crisis. Corporate humanity—adhering to its
ancient proclivity to “dirty its nest” by exploiting and despoiling natural
environments—is responsible. The destructive power of modern technology has
enabled societies to accelerate this, with devastating consequences to the land
and the wild creatures that share our planet. Ironically, had the human race
applied ethical principles set forth in the Bible to environmental stewardship,
such abuse would likely have been far less, if not curtailed.
I explore this and many other
related topics in my book Should Christians Be Environmentalists? I
would enjoy your comments. In my next blog, I’ll explain what the Bible means
when it instructs the human race to "subdue" and have “dominion” over nature (Gen. 1:28, KJV) .
Dan,
ReplyDeleteThanks for making these points. You state that much environmental degradation took place before the Christian era, and then that technological implementation unrestrained by christian worldview has been responsible for environmental degradation--this is a human not Christian problem. Granted. However, this does not address two points: (1) That the current concern for the environment is being voiced and led by mostly non-Christians; and (2) the outspokenness of many like your radio host and/or absence of christian voices advocating better environmental care. This is of course closely related to perceived conservative political/christian lack of respect for science. Thus, your points may be correct, but there is work to be done by Christians to address today's problems, which is proceeding too slowly.
I appreciate you comments, Richard, and we're pretty much on the same wave link. My analysis of the issue is considerable more in depth than what I could put in a blog article. If you read my book, Should Christians Be Environmentalists?, you will see that I also address both your concerns. However, I would have to think through your comment connecting Christian reluctance to get involved in environmental issue as lack of respect for science. There may some truth to that, but I think it's more politically motivated. But interesting thought. Either way, your absolutely right. Much work needs to be done by Christians to become more engaged in environmental issues. Dan
ReplyDeleteI just came across this great post - very insightful. I have actually just written a blog about Christianity's need to step in and take responsibility for creation.
ReplyDelete"We Came in Like a Wrecking Ball"
http://creationday.com/?page_id=40